Lee... you're lying. Your name is well-known among science and atheist blogs as a promoter of ID, albeit a non-religious one. Allow me to quote another comment you've made: http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2009/06/why_intelligent_design_fails.php"
"Regarding predator/ prey and parasite/ host relationships, it's apparent that either a competitive world was intended (one designer or design team), or designs were by competitive designers (or design groups). Over vast time, the second scenario is viable."
So... these multiple designers you believe in, are they aliens?
"I am an ID proponent who accepts evolutionary processes, but for 1) adaptation, and 2) biological diversity within species. I disagree with microevolutionary alterations accumulating over time to produce complexity and novelty. My conclusion is based on anatomic observations (morphologies and synergistic functionalities), as well as the DNA coding, and other molecular complexities. My views are subject to change as time (and study/ research) goes on."
Lee, this is the internet. You cannot get away with a lie when you're well-known.
MikeTheInfidel May 27, 2011
at 7:01am
Lee... you're lying. Your name is well-known among science and atheist blogs as a promoter of ID, albeit a non-religious one. Allow me to quote another comment you've made: http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2009/06/why_intelligent_design_fails.php"
"Regarding predator/ prey and parasite/ host relationships, it's apparent that either a competitive world was intended (one designer or design team), or designs were by competitive designers (or design groups). Over vast time, the second scenario is viable."
So... these multiple designers you believe in, are they aliens?
Plus, there's always your Amazon reviews of pro-ID books: http://www.amazon.com/review/R2E72FAVK8MTPE
And your comments on other blogs: http://forknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/09/03/the-macroevolution-fallacy/
"I am an ID proponent who accepts evolutionary processes, but for 1) adaptation, and 2) biological diversity within species. I disagree with microevolutionary alterations accumulating over time to produce complexity and novelty. My conclusion is based on anatomic observations (morphologies and synergistic functionalities), as well as the DNA coding, and other molecular complexities. My views are subject to change as time (and study/ research) goes on."
Lee, this is the internet. You cannot get away with a lie when you're well-known.