Sorrento police officer's speeding causes concerns, arguments at Ascension Parish meeting

Sorrento police officer's speeding causes concerns, arguments at Ascension Parish meeting
Sorrento Police Officer James Bell had been flagged 737 times in a 64-day period for speeding.Photo provided by SPD

POSTED: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - 1:00pm

UPDATED: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 - 1:04pm

An ordinance which prohibits any police officer from “taking his vehicle outside of Ascension Parish unless it is for official business,” was intended to be the focal point of Tuesday’s Town Meeting.

The ordinance became a hot topic when it was learned that Sorrento Police Officer James Bell had been flagged 737 times in a 64-day period while travelling at speeds in excess of 75 mph in his police vehicle.

Many of those instances occurred outside of Ascension Parish and Councilman Donald Schexnaydre came to the meeting looking for answers. He left disappointed.

“I want to understand your department’s policy on officers driving their units home when they live outside the Town of Sorrento,” Schexnaydre told Chief Theriot.

Theriot’s presented a copy of Attorney General Opinion 09-0013 which was rendered on January 27, 2010 in response to a request from Sorrento’s then mayor, Blake LeBlanc.

“I have inherent power since Sorrento is a Lawrason Act municipality,” Theriot declared as he held up the AG’s opinion as final authority. “I don’t know anything about the ordinance,” he stated as he confirmed that his policy is to allow officers to take their units home if they live within 35 miles of Sorrento.

Mayor Mike Lambert then joined the discussion, asking if a mere opinion trumps the law embodied in the ordinance at issue. Ordinance 9-01 reads, in pertinent part:
No officer shall take his vehicle outside Ascension Parish unless it is for official business;
No officer may use a police vehicle to go to and from home unless the officer is full-time and either resides in Ascension Parish or is on-call as result of an emergency in the town; and
The chief of police shall establish a policy concerning the use and maintenance of police vehicles by officers, whether on-duty or off-duty, subject to the foregoing rules.

“Isn’t it part of your job to be aware of the ordinances as Chief of Police?” asked resident, Doris Lee of Theriot.

“Not when they don’t make me aware of it,” responded the police chief who claimed not to have a book of ordinances as he again referred to the AG’s opinion.

“But that’s only an opinion, Chief,” began Mayor Lambert.

“Challenge me in court,” Theriot dared the mayor.

Councilman Schexnaydre inquired as to whether the police department had a written policy with regard to the issue.

“Challenge me in court,” Theriot again said, becoming more defiant.

Councilman Randy Anny joined the fray in Chief Theriot’s defense by reading part of AG Op. 09-0013. “The (Louisiana) Supreme Court recognized that a chief of police of a Lawrason Act municipality…has inherent power of supervision over the police department…This authority includes assigning a police department vehicle to himself for around the clock use in conjunction with his 24-hour duty and extends likewise to assigning vehicles to other police personnel for use in their official duties, such as 24-hour ‘on call’ status.”

Anny concluded that, “Once the municipality turns the unit over to the police chief it’s up to his discretion.”

The AG’s opinion goes on to state that “the mayor and council may restrict use of police vehicles outside of the town’s corporate limits, if such use is not for an official law enforcement use.”

Councilmen Anny and Schexnaydre then engaged in a heated exchange which resulted in a heated Mayor Lambert.

He declared, “Mr. Anny, you’re out of order!”

For more on the story, click here.

Comments News Comments

Post new Comment